IRC conference on channel #2W, 13 April 1997

The case for an OpenAmiga - Part 2

For this conference only a fairly raw log is available. The log begins just as Alain Penders enters the discussion, and covers about 4½ hours!

People

NameIRC nickname
Participants
Giorgio GomelskyGio
Skal Loretskal
Thom McIntoshThom
Fleecy Mossfleecy
Alain PendersRexOrient
?eagle


fleecy
Hi Rex, that was going to be on the first projects I recommended if no one was doing it.
Thom
what level of functionality ??
RexOrient
fleecy: javascript will be plenty available... there are already 2 different implementations in the works... we'll just make one to be complete...
fleecy
Rex; what you shooting for? 1.1? We've just go a great 1.02 JDBC thing going
RexOrient
1.1.2
fleecy
Nice! I am looking forwards to playing - is there anything the JMS could do to help?
RexOrient
hmmm...cough up $100k for a full source license from Sun ?
fleecy
rex: I am looking at Java for most of our serious JMS apps, moving from HTML to a Data Repository and building the client pages dynamically.
fleecy
So now Belgium is famous for 2 things, Stella AND a sense of humour!
RexOrient
oh no don't mention Stella! Water is better! Kriek rulez !
fleecy
if GW are serious about rewriting the OS I imagine they would already realise that a JVM would have to feature heavily. A lot of these cheap embedded booths they keep talking about are no more than JVMS anyway; take a JVM enabled AmigaOS, a cheaop card and some ram and you could knock them out cheap
RexOrient
:)
fleecy
Kreik? Isn't than Klingon for lizard?
fleecy
any plans are turning the tables around and providing class act as an IFC for Java apps?
fleecy
Thom:Tell us more about your VRML ship.
RexOrient
VRML ship ???
Thom
fleecy: ok, its an interface for the 25 year history of Greenpeace. SGI know about amiga , no ? :))
fleecy
what are you building it on?
RexOrient
fleecy: urmm... I'm not really sure what you mean.... you talking about making a GUI designer etc ?
Thom
a text based VRML editor mainly most of the initial modeling was done in Virtus Walkthrough Pro
fleecy
Rex: I was wondering, the AWT buttons etc suck bad - I had to do my own just to (x,Y) some buttons cos I used a panel as a blank map on which to draw and didn't use the LAyout manager. I was wondering if you were going to take the Class Act engine/set and build a distributable set of gadgets for use in Java apps.
fleecy
Thom:do you have any dubious french characters walking around the ship 8-)
Thom
the out put is pretty light compared to most regular 3d modellers which is what u need for speed
RexOrient
fleecy: uggg.. we haven't thought about this... ever. if it proves to be useful... but there are like a bazillion gui construction kits available for AWT
thom
fleecy: hehe, well we want to make it multi user... :)
fleecy
Part of the project on our website is to investigate whether VRML and say OpenGl will ever come together so to speak - what do you think?
RexOrient
fleecy: Frank Mariak told me that CyberGL is completely OpenGL compliant now except for window handling
fleecy
Rex: a nice Amiga friendly one would be good though - could send the Amiga look of apps into the real world - actually, to WebCruiser, are you still considering an active desktop feature?
RexOrient;
fleecy: and VRML for amiga is in the works
skal
I just had a thought: Sun has set itself up as a bulwark against Wintel Hegemony. I wonder if they would like to throw some cash our way?
Thom
well I know opengl is the main engine for SGI's Cosmo Player...
fleecy
Rex:so you boys are doing a VRMl as well?
RexOrient
fleecy: I didn't say that. I was referring to Vormel... a vrml engine being made by some swedish guy...
Thom
phase5 must have some plans in this area i would have thought...
* skal would like to note that we are now covered under the rules of "Gentleman's NDA". Let's consider anything Rex reveals to be sensitive and not for distribution.
RexOrient
fleecy: active desktop feature ? You're confusing me now :)
fleecy
Yeah, Thom pointed me at the Vormel page - that's one project I would like to see us funding. Says its Ibrowse only - and now to a delicate question for you. You know we are trying to push the AmiGA forwards where it is lacking - we would want Vormel to be a standard plug in for all Amiga Browsers - will Mocca be a standard plugin for your competitiors? Ho do you see us working with competing companies in the same area?
RexOrient
skal: well, this isn't a secret project of ours... Vormel belongs to IBrowse/Omnipresence :)
Thom
DimensionX do a vRML viewer written in Java I believe....;)
fleecy
Rex:Active Desktop - remember on the mailing list, I was asking whether you could use the Browser not just on URLs but also on the local HD/CD/DD as a sort of universal file engine...
RexOrient
fleecy: well, we would like to support all other browsers with MOca. It's not straight forward though...
RexOrient
Thom: yeah, but dimentionX licensed their stuff to microsoft. so far for getting it on the amiga :)
Thom
Rex: but Microsoft are putting out the source as a reference for anybody...
RexOrient
the problem is general for browser plugins... the CA browsers use a rather open plug-in system AFAIK... hooks based. The MUI browsers use a MUI class. both systems are not easily exchangable.
RexOrient
fleecy: also, I don't want to put Vormel on the list of things to sponsor :)
fleecy
Rex: any chance then you/ voyager/aweb/Ibrowse could agree on a common interface to share yours and third party plugin?
skal
fleecy: Excellent idea...
RexOrient
thom: sure... I don't believe in M$ giving things away for free :)
Thom
Rex: microsoft are trying desperately to play the good guys with VRML...
RexOrient
fleecy: I talked about it with Stefan (IBrowse)... he was interested (actually - he sugggested it)... for AWeb and Voyager it may be a bigger problem.
Thom
because they realise they have a problem on their hands, thay have already been seen off once by the VAG.
fleecy
rex: but we do need a VRML and a cool one/ Thom and me would like to see the Amiga leading the world in VRMl much the same way it led in multimedia - you guys would all play a huge part in that.
RexOrient
fleecy: but like I said... we already found that the largest problem is not wanting to make a standard but the technical side... the differences between MUI and the rest...
fleecy
Rex: is that politics or more technical details?
skal
Rex: A good argument for OPEN, and everyone on the same page, industry standards, a council, et al, ad nauseaum...
RexOrient
fleecy: lets say that we have vrml plans that aren't based on vormel and that would bring us way further ahead. These are just plans so far, nothing concrete. but I don't want to blow up our options by going supporting vormel
RexOrient
fleecy: technical
fleecy
rex:so you are saying MUI interfers with process? I thought it just sat on top and played interface? If they are plans then would you consider JMS help or even better, bringing them to the OpenAmiga as a standard?
skal
fleecy: that sounds like something that would occur in a perfect world. Got one you can loan me? ;')
RexOrient
fleecy: it's a different design idea. It should be possible to make a common standard with interfaces to both MUI and CA... but it'll have to be designed and all sides will have to give in a little. it'll be a lot of work though, I can ensure you that
RexOrient
(About OpenAmiga) fleecy: sure :)
RexOrient
fleecy: I expect to have a more concrete idea about whether or not they will happen in a few weeks.
RexOrient
brb
skal
Rex: Open Amiga Standards Council. Say that three times and click your heels. ;')
RexOrient
Open Amiga Standards Council.
RexOrient
Open Amiga Standards Council.
RexOrient
Open Amiga Standards Council.
RexOrient
god - I love copy & paste :)
fleecy
Rex: if you like I'd love to send you the design docs for our website which include some ideas. I want the website to leap forwards and pull the Amiga with it, a completely immersive experience moving towards William Gibson ideas - it all depends on you lot though 8-)
RexOrient
fleecy: sure, send 'em over :)
eagle
fleecy: Is "Jay Miner Society" official now?
fleecy
rex: a lot of work yes, but worth it for you...?
fleecy
eagle:no, Carol is still uncontacted about name
Thom
the Amiga community could take VRML where it supposed to be , a virtual community on the net.
skal
eagle: Carl offered to drive to SF, to talk to Carol. Interesting...Carl was the first person here today...
RexOrient
fleecy: yes. on the condition that all amiga browser switch to it and will drop their proprietary interfaces.
fleecy
Rex:give us your personal EMail then fleecy@netreach.net - and don't frEak about the AmIRC - it could be any IRC client 8-) Then we all win - could you chat to Stefan about it or is that hoping for too much?
* skal basks in the warming rays of Convergence...Where's that reflector so I can hit under my chin...;')
fleecy
Skal: See, if we talk we ALL want the same thing 8-) Back in 5, kid bathing activities
skal
fleecy: I have known this for years. Just gotta hit the old mule in the head with a 2 by 4, to get it's attention, from time to time...;')
gio
Even though not a techie, seems to me the last few minutes exchanged tween fleecy and rex have OPENED UP (there goes that word again) fascinanting arguments for Council and it's relevance to any new owner, community and rest of computer world. Pretty certain meeself that future developments in computing (and opposition to domination by few) will have to follow this model. Innovation behooves Amiga tradition. Could all this be put in some form eecognizable by GW for instance?
skal
Gio: Open Amiga Systems Council. It keeps coming back to that. Order out of chaos. If Rex nails JAVA for the Amiga, isn't that where EVERY Amiga owner, developer and user will want to go, today?
RexOrient
back
Thom
gio: we need to stress to GW that the Amiga IS a community as it stands, thats pretty much all that is left after the last few years.
RexOrient
re e-mail: alain@Finale-Dev.com will do.
skal
I can talk with Stefan but I think right now we can assume that he's in. I suggest someone else - someone neutral - talks to Olli and Yvon.
skal
Rex: We can do that. JAVA is too important to let the GUI get in the way.
fleecy
Skal: IBM have pinned their hopes to Java as an OS2 saviour. Same for AmigaOS. Once the big apps are written in it, no on cares what the underlying OS is and then people can use whichever they want - that is the promise of Java, that is why MS keeps trying to sabotage it. Their latest is the best though - an outflanking - they want a UVM- Universal Virtual Machine which runs ANY sourcecode - no point in all the VB guys learning java if VB runs on a UV.
RexOrient
skal: ahwell.. I'll go for it if you organise it. I don't care particularly if you all have to switch to FWC though ;-)
skal
Rex: GUI is so mall, in reflection. JAVA is huge, beyond imagination.
fleecy
skal: not even the half of it - Java provides the life, the wind, the interaction in VRML - it breathes life into the VRML world.
skal
I don't want Amiga JAVA held back by developers tools. If GUI development tools are breaking JAVA, then developers need to get back into the woodshed. Speaking as a consumer...;')
RexOrient
skal: urmm... not too fast. the only thing we're talking about is the browsers plug-in/applet interface. this has nothing to do with Java itself really... having java use MUI is possible ... just replace the AWT classes. The problem occurs at a lower level. MUI makes it eassier to write one big object that encapsulates the application. for classact/boopsi, the application is the main things and the GUI is just a layer around it (the way it should be IMHO)... because of those differences, the way both sides designed their plug-in API differs.
Thom
Rex: is this a complex job ?
skal
Rex: I see it all the time, on the pc. Software breaking Software. For no good reason, except the fact that that there is a little hacker in us all. I don't want to see a fragile Amiga Platform descend to that. Standards, or split.
fleecy
Thanks Skal, bloody Win95 crap!!!
skal
Rex: I thought an API defined a Standard, not a weapon of war?
RexOrient
thom: I can't tell really... we'd have to look deeper into it. That in itself will be a problem.. since someone will have to get access to 4 proprietary interface specs :)
fleecy
so if I knock something together for the 4 browser groups to talk about?
RexOrient
skal: hell no... the software world uses proprietaty API's all the time. It's how you protect your business.
fleecy
Rex:what I don't understand is the process sits under the interface - each of your processes should present the same data and then the prop interfaces can do what they like with it....why isn't it like that?
RexOrient
like, I could support the standard - letting me run all plug-ins from other browsers... but I could make MOca use my own proprietary interface... giving me an advantage
fleecy
skal: it's true - that's what MS does!
RexOrient
Omnipresence might do the same for Vormel, too. Right now, this is exactly what we do... all proprietary although we plan to support MOca for other browsers anyway.... the standard would just make it eassier for us
skal
If I was writing plugins, or apps, I would want it to be the most peacefully coexistant thing on the planet...something I don't often see...
fleecy
rex: but you could all agree to write all data to a common structure that your interfaces could pull off, same as you could all agree a plug in port for the plug ins (much like datatypes?) and you still get you propritary process advantage...
Thom
I'm just going to see if i can find the Microsoft press release regarding their giving away VRML viewer source...
RexOrient
fleecy: if a plug-in is just an image, it's dead easy. if it's gadgets, controls, animations etc, it's hard. like who renders the frames of the animation ? when ? you can't just render to a screen without coordination... the buttons.. the browser gets the idcmp messages.. how do they get passed.. .those systems are completely different.
RexOrient
fleecy: yes, it's like datatypes, just 2x as hard. That's the main disadvantage of DT's now.. they don't handle input and animations is a kludge to say the least
fleecy
rex: true - I was thinking more of, a picture is a base description, you say draw this gif, draw that text in that size - what buttons you choose or how many times a second you choose to draw it is upto the interface you are using.
RexOrient
fleecy: well, it can be done - no doubt. it's just not straight forward. I don't know he exact implications. This isme something for the GUI guys to figure out
Thom
ok, here it is : http://www.microsoft.com/corpinfo/press/1997/jan97/msdonpr.htm
fleecy
rex:so we are actually looking at a bigger problem - possibly within the OS itself - a much cleaner, abstracted way of passing logical information between each other for the different physical systems to write - sort of like a HAL?
skal
fleecy: lord knows I have loaded terrabytes of Win'95 complient stuff, with gigs of .dlls..On my Amiga the LIBS subdir is so much more...efficient.Why couldn't the industry have used that metaphor, rather than one that seems to eat it's own foot?
fleecy
everyone: you see, this is the sort of thing the Industry Council should be hashing out!!!
gio
I see and agree.
RexOrient
fleecy: well... you know... this may all be wasted effort
skal
fleecy: Tell me something I don't know...<sheesh>
Thom
fleecy: yes, but we need a formalised way of presenting it and making it public
RexOrient
if GW2k restarts OS development, the GUI system will evolve.. and as long as we don't know where it's going, we're trying to shoot a moving target.
fleecy
rex: maybe but I waste huge effort everyday at work pissing my life away on corporate craposystems - if I'm going to find a toilet I'd rather it be Amiga shaped 8-)
gio
How could it's wastefulness be assured against?
RexOrient
maybe a more general and more important thing is looking into what to do with BOOPSI & MUI...in the future..
fleecy
thom:and that's what we have got to get out - how about making a start - some documetn, some discussions, send it around us who actually care, try and form it up???
RexOrient
well, get the browser makers to agree to a common API, and we'll talk...
* skal uses colourful language to express determination...;')
fleecy
rex: I agree - we all know the whole OS needs rewriting, new ideas to the problems we all have discovered - Dave's IC is the place to do it
gio
I wish ol' Sassenrath was still around, but we'll send him copy of this if OK with principals...
RexOrient
sure
fleecy
Rex:OK, if you get time 8-) send me a few ideas about what you would want the browser "committee" to talk about - I'll swap you one boring doc for another 8^) and I won't mention Stella Beer again.
gio
As matter of fact I just got an idea. We'll send it to Dave too and we'll organize a private IRC early next week for you guys to trash this out. Upon which we edit doc and send it off to GW.
fleecy
fine by me.
RexOrient
only if you find a better irc network by next week :-p
skal
Rex:8- P ;')
RexOrient
I hope you guys realize that BORG is a Vapor spy :)
Thom
fleecy : my skills are lacking in this area on how to even start...
skal
Rex: A SPYBOT? Ahhh, sheesh...
fleecy
thom:Ok, I'll get Skal's doc (when he finds his wax crayons), firm it up and bounce it around us all.
skal
fleecy: I work in fingerpaints, exclusively...<sniff>
RexOrient
ok, I'm off to bed. 2am here :/
skal
Night, Rex! Thanx loads for coming here! Really!
RexOrient
see you all later sometime... take care.. bye
Thom
is there a book on how to do this finger painting thing ?? :)
skal
: Thom: Fingerpainting is a Zen thing for me...;') Oh, what a cool thing! <skal grins like a mule eating briars...>
Thom
skal: like 6 weeks levitating and then a single immaculate master stroke of the forfinger ? ;)
skal
Thom: ...and we had our JAVA Highlander here, sword and all, not to mention his Holy Oban...;')
fleecy
now THAT was worth wife hassle for - Alain is a cool guy if you stay off of his bugbears...
* skal collapses....WooHoo!!!
Thom
why are these developers so itchy about one another ?
Thom
well it was good to get a developer here.
skal
fleecy: no, when the time comes, I will do seppuku with a spork from Taco Bell...;')
Thom
they need a sense of the the larger picture !!
skal
fleecy: What a brilliant way of putting it. Christ, I have to get back to Galsgow to brush up on vernacular...;')
fleecy
skal:OK, someone definitely send the good bits to Carl and Dave, Does anyone want to do a summary bit for the website?
fleecy
where's galsgow? Is that near Phew Bork? That would be Da' Fleece.
skal
Bork, bork, bork...;')
fleecy
skal:knob off!!! I've still got 8 projects to put on the webpage, youR fingerpainting to read and a bit I want to send to Carl and well as Alain's stuff.
gio
Cool...Think this IRC was fruitful in unexpected ways. Feel the vrml exchanges adding very HEAVY arguments to Council usefulness.
Thom
well I hope he goes and looks at the microsoft/dimensionx thing.What we need is some way of getting the power to run VRML on the Amiga
skal
gio: They have no idea of the depth of the resource, as regards the developer community, and what this tenacious group of people can accomplish. After all, the CATS were playing in the sandbox.
fleecy
The website projects should keep some going for a a few weeks - the IC must be our next objective.
Thom
in the mean time I can build what ever is required as far as modeling/ behaviour stuff goes.
fleecy
Thom:well I am buying a Pios 1 and a quad board so I will be fine 8-)
Thom
we need A12oo's with powerup boards
fleecy
Thom:look at the VRMl project on the site - see if that gives you any ideas - we aren' ready to do anything yet on the Amiga at least but we need a solid basis to start planning
Thom
and a cool VRML/irc app
fleecy
Thom - if you look at the UNCLE project you'll see phase 1 of the eventual VRML cient app to end all apps
Thom
do we have anybody on 2w that has a relationship with phase5 ?

The log was interrupted here, but there wasn't much missing in between.

Thom
we should be acting as somekind of cement between all these developers...
fleecy
Thom:yep, and that is how I see the IC - I would like to see us ignore GW and create our own virtual computer which we could licence to anyone - they code their own stuff and just need to pay attention to THE interface standards.
eagle
fleecy: I don't think it's a problem having both PIOS and abox, as long as they both will run the same OS. They'd just be two differant third party Amigas.
gio
Thom, whole community needs cementing...Alas ferocious individualism prevails, that is...until "punters" see something they want to be part of. This something has to be sooo cool, something an individual alone could just not get together. Hence this here effort...
skal
gio: tonight, before our own eyes, we saw clear proof of that. Just extend the metaphor to the whole industry.
fleecy
eagle:the only problem I hear is all these guys on csa.* going on about all the HW banging they are going to be doing - that'll shut our open idea down real quick. Don't get me wrong - I'd love to see P5 succeed - they deserve to0, putting their necks out like that - we do want to keep them together but, just as Alain and the others must talk, so must P5 and Pios and everyone else
skal
fleecy: From Dave's lips to god's ear: " I designed the PIOS 1 so people could whack the metal"...
fleecy
skal:really??? What a naughty Dave - I suppose it's OK iF you allow it as a proprietary addition to the openOS - I'd like to hear him defend both ideas though?
Thom
gio: absolutely agree. I think our "coming out" presentation to the amiga community is equally important if not more so, as to GW.
skal
fleecy: It's easy. Metal Whackers kick the platform in the arse. He like people searching for the equivelent of the fatal Trash-80 hardware poke...
gio
OK, fleecy, seems to me you should be heading his ad hoc discussing OPEN stuff committee, preparing questions for the guys and we should aim at a "Summit" IRC ASAP, not to miss out on presentation timing. Community at large also important, Thom, but secondary right now.
eagle
fleecy: having both pios and phase5 might stop the hardware banger. Also, wouldn't they need specs, etc. from the manufacturers before they could bang the hardware?
Thom
The vast amiga majority wants unification, we need to assimilate that as part of the strength of this effort.
skal
In spades...
fleecy
eagle: they should both be invited. HW bangers need manuals - ha! I remember running a For i = 1 to 32767, for j = 1 to 255; poke i,j;wait 100 just to see
fleecy
Sculley Sculley Sculley!!! Anyway my drunken incorruptibles, King of the Hill beckons - It.s been a blast. I will continue to smack the website and start putting the OPenthing together - will chat to Dave after he reads the logs. Bye bye.
gio
Thom, correct. But there's a sheepishness about biggish groups. They join if they feel more personally addressed in their segmented sensibilities. This effort is typical example of "group dynamics" at work. Say what unites us is the OPEN idea we're particularly excited about. Others want something else...So our aim should be designing such an argument for openess. it's downright irresistable...
Thom
night fleecy
skal
Nite, William! ;')
fleecy
Skal's gonna get a KICKING!!!!
skal
fleecy: Pack a lunch...;')
fleecy
for your nurse eh?
gio
Bye fleecy, again thanks.
skal
nae, me bonnie wee laddie, fer' you will be at it for a while...;')
fleecy
Ok skal, I Let you live for a while longer, if only to teach you a better accent...

All pages on this web site are copyright 1998 Jay Miner Society.